THE CRIMES OF SENATOR EHIGIE EDOBOR A.K.A. "GODWIN" UZAMERE
1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. A Real Man

Why Did SDNY Judges Garaufis and Sand Disobey
28 U.S.C. §455 By Refusing to Disqualify Themselves?
Will a complaint to U.S. Senate's and U.S House's judiciary committees help?
 judgejacobs2.jpg judgegaraufis.jpg allenkaye.jpg

 
Cheryl D. Uzamere
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (718) 647-1708
Fax: (267) 543-3317

FAX

To:

Phone No.

Fax No.

Hon. John Conyers
Hon. Barbara Lee, Chair
202-225-3951
202-226-9776
202-225-7680
202-225-9817

CC:

Phone No.

Fax No.

Hon. Patrick J. Leahy
Hon. Sheldon Whitehouse
Hon. Kimba Wood
Lev Dassin
202-224 7703
202-224-8352
212-805-0125
212-637-2300
202-224-9516
202-228-2260
212-805-7900
212-637-2390

SUBJECT:

Federal and New York State Judiciaries' use of the Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b's “Law of the Moser”

DATE:

June 15, 2009

Dear Congressman Conyers:

The reasons I took the liberty of reporting these complaints to you is: 1) because you sponsored H.R. 40, the bill to examine reparations to the descendants of African slaves; 2) because you are a member of the Congressional Black Caucus; and 3) because you are  the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Following this page please find attached copies of the complaints that I filed against the Honorable Nicholas G. Garaufis and against the Honorable Leonard B. Sand.  The complaints concern the judgess blatant refusal to disqualify themselves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455, disqualification of judges.

 

complaintformgaraufis.jpg
complaintformgaraufispg2.jpg
complaintformsandpg1.jpg
complaintformsandpg2.jpg

 
Statement of Facts/Allegations
Regarding Judge Garaufis

        1) That the Honorable Nicholas G. Garaufis is an Ashkenazi (see Exhibits A1 and A2) and is a practicing member of Judaism as is his wife, Elizabeth Seidman.

        2) That five (5) of the defendants in federal lawsuit 08-CV-0891, namely, Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Jack Gladstein are Ashkenazim (see Exhibit B1).

        3) That one of the tenets of the aforesaid individuals' religion has its basis in the Talmudic doctrine regarding Law of the moser”; and that the aforesaid Halakhic law prevents Ashkenazim from reporting the crimes of fellow Ashkenazim to non-Jewish law enforcement authorities (see Exhibit B2).

        4) That Count III of the aforesaid complaint has its basis in the violation of my civil rights.

        5) That violation of civil rights is the same thing as deprivation of civil rights.

        6) That deprivation of civil rights is covered by 42 U.S.C. §1983, 42 U.S.C. §198518 U.S.C. §241 and 42 U.S.C. §242 (see Exhibit C).

        7) That the aforesaid laws describe “rights” as “any rights...under the Constitution...in action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.”

        8) That the aforesaid rights are guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution (see Exhibit D).

        9) That deprivation of constitutional rights created an implied cause of action based on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (see Exhibit E).

       10) That the aforesaid U.S. Supreme Court and the legal doctrine stare decisis et quieta non movere gave me the legal right to file the lawsuit that Judge Garaufis dismissed.

       11) That Judge Garaufis knew or should have known the aforesaid laws at the time that he rendered his decision on my complaint.

       12) That based on my understanding of the legal doctrine stare decisis and Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, federal law must be liberally construed, especially in the case of pro se litigants (see Exhibit G).

       13) That Judge Garaufis did not liberally construe my complaint; and that Judge Garaufis took advantage of my lack of knowledge, both of secular law and Talmudic law.

       14) That based on the aforesaid knowledge, Judge Garaufis should have recused himself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455; and that Judge Garaufis refusal to disqualify himself pursuant to the aforesaid law is fraud upon the Court and is an act of treason on the Court (see Exhibit F).

       15) That Judge Garaufis betrayed my trust by withholding his knowledge of the aforesaid information.

       16) That based on the actions of Judge Garaufis and every other member of the Ashkenazim employed in a supervisory capacity within any government agency to which I have filed a complaint regarding attorneys Allen E. Kaye's, Harvey Shapiro's, Bernard J. Rostanski's and Jack Gladstein's act of perjury and their facilitation of my husband's immigration fraud, identity fraud and refusal to pay child support and the deprivation of my and my daughter's constitutional rights as a result of the aforesaid crimes has acted in a manner that has caused my complaint to be ignored; such that there appears to be a clear pattern of Talmud-oriented bias based on the Babylonian Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b, and in violation of: 1) the First Amendment (no government-sponsored religion; right to redress); 2) Fifth Amendment (no loss of life, liberty, property without due process of law); 3) Fourteenth Amendment (no loss of life, liberty, property without due process of law; equal protection under the law); 4)42 U.S.C. §1983, 42 U.S.C. §198518 U.S.C. §241 and 42 U.S.C. §242 (civil rights violations).

       17) That the members of the Ashkenazim to which I refer include, but are not limited to: 1) Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel, USCIS; 2) Judge Leonard B. Garaufis, EDNY; Judge Garaufis, SDNY; 3) Thomas A. Klonick, Chair, NYS Committee on Judicial Conduct; 4) Alan W. Friedberg, Chief Counsel, NYS Departmental Disciplinary Committee; 4) Michael Bloomberg, Mayor, City of New York; Judge Abraham Gerges, Administrative Judge, NYS Supreme Court, Judge Jeffrey S. Sunshine, New York State Supreme Court Justice, Judge Eric I. Prus, New York State Supreme Court Justice; 5) Robert Morgenthau, New York County District Attorney; and 6) Amy Feinstein, attorney, Kings County District Attorney's Office.

       18) That based on what I now see as an irrefutable pattern of constitutional violations and the role that Judge Garaufis played in what I perceive to be an Ashkenazim-led, Talmud-based religious conspiracy of silence to ensure that members of the Ashkenazim are not brought to justice by non-Jews, I believe that Judge Garaufis and other members of the Ashkenazim in positions of governmental authority have already begun onspiring to prevent me from filing further complaints fellow Ashkenazim attorneys Allen Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Jack Gladstein and Bernard J. Rostanski by using Paul Brunhuber and other members of the U.S. Marshall Service to threaten to place me in a mental institution where members of the Ashkenazim who are psychiatrists will use drugs to keep me silent and rely on my status as being mentally ill so that the non-Jewish public is frightened to file legal complaints against any member of the Ashkenazim.

       19) That based on what I believe to be a conspiracy to ensure that I do not bring the the aforesaid attorneys to justice, I believe that Judge Garaufis and as yet unknown members of the Ashkenazim will conspire to have me murdered pursuant to the Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b.

 
Statement of Facts/Allegations
Judge Leonard B. Sand, SDNY

        1) That Honorable Leonard B. Sand is an Ashkenazi (see Exhibits A1 and A2).

        2) That five (?) of the defendants in federal lawsuit 2009-CV-3506, namely, Allen E. Kaye, Bernard J. Rostanski, Jack Gladstein, Robert E. Juceam and the Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine are Ashkenazim (see Exhibit B1).

        3) That one of the tenets of the aforesaid individuals' religion has its basis in the Talmudic doctrine regarding Law of the moser”; and that the aforesaid Halakhic law prevents Ashkenazim from reporting the crimes of fellow Ashkenazim to non-Jewish law enforcement authorities (see Exhibit B2).

        4) That Count VI specifically (as well all other counts I later learned) has its basis in the violation of my civil rights.

        5) That violation of civil rights is the same thing as deprivation of civil rights.

        6) That deprivation of civil rights is covered by 42 U.S.C. §1983, 42 U.S.C. §198518 U.S.C. §241 and 42 U.S.C. §242 (see Exhibit C).

        7) That the aforesaid laws describe “rights” as “any rights...under the Constitution...in action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.”

        8) That the aforesaid rights are guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution (see Exhibit D).

        9) That deprivation of constitutional rights created an implied cause of action based on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (see Exhibit E).

       10) That the aforesaid U.S. Supreme Court and the legal doctrine stare decisis et quieta non movere gave me the legal right to file the lawsuit that Judge Sand dismissed.

       11) That Judge Sand knew or should have known the aforesaid laws at the time that he rendered his decision on my complaint.

       12) That based on my understanding of the legal doctrine stare decisis and Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, federal law must be liberally construed, especially in the case of pro se litigants (see Exhibit G).

       13) That Judge Sand did not liberally construe my complaint; and that Judge Sand took advantage of my lack of knowledge, both of secular law and Talmudic law.

       14) That based on the aforesaid knowledge, Judge Sand should have recused himself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455; and that at Judge Sand's refusal to disqualify himself pursuant to the aforesaid law is fraud upon the Court and is an act of treason on the Court (see Exhibit F).

       15) That Judge Sand betrayed my trust by withholding his knowledge of the aforesaid information.

       16) That based on the actions of Judge Sand and every other member of the Ashkenazim employed in a supervisory capacity within any government agency to which I have filed a complaint regarding attorneys Allen E. Kaye's, Harvey Shapiro's, Bernard J. Rostanski's and Jack Gladstein's act of perjury and their facilitation of my husband's immigration fraud, identity fraud and refusal to pay child support and the deprivation of my and my daughter's constitutional rights as a result of the aforesaid crimes has acted in a manner that has caused my complaint to be ignored; such that there appears to be a clear pattern of Talmud-oriented bias based on the Babylonian Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b, and in violation of: 1) the First Amendment (no government-sponsored religion; right to redress); 2) Fifth Amendment (no loss of life, liberty, property without due process of law); 3) Fourteenth Amendment (no loss of life, liberty, property without due process of law; equal protection under the law); 4)42 U.S.C. §1983, 42 U.S.C. §198518 U.S.C. §241 and 42 U.S.C. §242 (civil rights violations).

       17) That the members of the Ashkenazim to which I refer include, but are not limited to: 1) Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel, USCIS; 2) Judge Leonard B. Sand, EDNY; Judge Sand, SDNY; 3) Thomas A. Klonick, Chair, NYS Committee on Judicial Conduct; 4) Alan W. Friedberg, Chief Counsel, NYS Departmental Disciplinary Committee; 4) Michael Bloomberg, Mayor, City of New York; Judge Abraham Gerges, Administrative Judge, NYS Supreme Court, Judge Jeffrey S. Sunshine, New York State Supreme Court Justice, Judge Eric I. Prus, New York State Supreme Court Justice; 5) Robert Morgenthau, New York County District Attorney; and 6) Amy Feinstein, attorney, Kings County District Attorney's Office.

       18) That based on what I now see as an irrefutable pattern of constitutional violations and the role that Judge Sand played in what I perceive to be an Ashkenazim-led, Talmud-based religious conspiracy of silence to ensure that members of the Ashkenazim are not brought to justice by non-Jews, I believe that Judge Sand and other members of the Ashkenazim in positions of governmental authority have already begun onspiring to prevent me from filing further complaints fellow Ashkenazim attorneys Allen Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Jack Gladstein and Bernard J. Rostanski by using Paul Brunhuber and other members of the U.S. Marshall Service to threaten to place me in a mental institution where members of the Ashkenazim who are psychiatrists will use drugs to keep me silent and rely on my status as being mentally ill so that the non-Jewish public is frightened to file legal complaints against any member of the Ashkenazim.

       19) That based on what I believe to be a conspiracy to ensure that I do not bring the the aforesaid attorneys to justice, I believe that Judge Sand and as yet unknown members of the Ashkenazim will conspire to have me murdered pursuant to the Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b.

Exhibit A1 and A2

ethnicdivisions.jpg
AshkenaziJews.jpg

Exhibits B1 and B2
(for Judge Garaufis)

BushvUzamerepg1.jpg
BushvUzamerepg9.jpg

Exhibit B1 and B2
(for Judge Sand)

federallawpg1.jpg
federallawpg14.jpg