1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. A Real Man

Corrupt Justices Prus, Sunshine, D'Emic and Schack Committed Fraud Upon The Court By Granting Multiple S.L.A.P.P. -like Adjournments and Rulings In Favor of Defendants Who Never Interposed An Answer and Never Showed Up
Identity fraud victim filed several complaints with Administrative Justice Sheila Hinds-Radix -- who did nothing
Will Justice Thomas Scuccimarra Judge in Favor of Plaintiff, Or Will He Copy Corrupt Judges,
Render An Illegal Decision and Commit Fraud Against the Court yet again?
scuccimarra.jpg  JudgeDEmic2.jpg ArthurMSchack.jpg hinds-radix.jpg

The Honorable Thomas Scuccimarra's Decision to my
motion to file a late claim coming soon!
How does a powerful white judge render a decision when the plaintiff with the air-tight lawsuit is a poor, disabled nigger and the defendant's agents, who Plaintiff has proven committed heinous federal crimes are rich, powerful white men???


State of New York
Court of Claims
Cheryl D. Uzamere                                                   Claim
                                                                             Affidavit in Support of Motion for
       -against-                                                          Permission to File a Late Claim
State of New York* 
COUNTY OF KINGS           ) ss:

        I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, being duly sworn, depose and say that:

        1)     That I am the Claimant in the above entitled action.

        2)     That I make this Affidavit in support of my motion for permission to file a late claim.

        3)     That any alleged “failure” of Claimant's not filing a timely claim was because of circumstances over which Claimant had no control.

        4)     That the Court of Claims Act §10(6) permits claimants to file motions late if the delay in filing is excusable and in the interest of justice.

        5)     That the New York Daily News made its article public on November 5, 2009; that the aforesaid event took place after any and all incidents for which Claimant filed past lawsuits with the Eastern District and Southern District courts and for which Defendant State of New York may wish to use res judicata as an poor excuse to hide the bad acts of its agents, one of whom was described in the aforementioned article as “a courthouse source” (see Exhibit A).

        6)     That during Claimant's stay as an inpatient with Defendant agent Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, Claimant was not permitted to use Kingsboro's notary public to notarize Claimant's handwritten claim or to mail any correspondence pertaining to Claimant's desire to file a lawsuit against Defendant.

        7)     That Defendant, either by its agent Kingsboro Psychiatric Center or its judiciary employee Judge Schack, refused to allow Claimant to go to court; that Defendant's medical employee Dr. Marie Bauduy told Claimant that Defendant's judiciary employee Judge Schack called Kingsboro and ordered Claimant not to be produced; that Claimant alleges that Defendant's judiciary employee Judge Schack's goal was to declare Claimant unfit to proceed to trial to hide the fact that the Defendants never interposed an answer and never filed their appearances; that the events Claimant describes is this paragraph took place after any and all incidents for which Claimant filed past lawsuits with the Eastern District and Southern District courts and for which Defendant State of New York may wish to use res judicata as an poor excuse to hide the bad acts of its agents (Exhibit B pages 1 to 3 and Exhibit C ).

        8)     That Claimant was released on or around February 5, 2010.

        9)     That Claimant alleges that on or around February 25, 2010 that she was forcibly removed from her apartment while faxing a complaint against Defendant's judiciary employee Judge Jeffrey S. Sunshine based on Defendant's claim that there was an order of protection filed against Claimant by the Defendant.

       10)     That Claimant has never seen this order of protection, and that Defendant has refused to show Claimant a copy of the order of protection.

       11)     That Claimant alleges that based on Defendant State of New York's judiciary employee's Judge Jeffrey S. Sunshine's refusal to arrest Eugene O. Uzamere for submitting the fraudulent counter-affidavit, the document was then illegally submitted to and published by the New York Daily News by its agent/staff writer Scott Shifrel, after which Claimant was arrested; that based on the aforesaid allegation that Claimant delay in filing the claim in a timely manner is excusable (Exhibit D).

       12)     That Claimant alleges that Defendant State of New York had notice of the essential facts constituting the claim because Defendant State of New York caused the conditions for which Claimant filed a claim.

        13)     That Claimant alleges that Defendant State of New York had the opportunity to investigate the circumstances underlying the claim because Defendant State of New York caused those conditions that created Claimant's claim.

       14)     That Claimant alleges that her claim appears to be meritorious based on Claimant's belief that the the newspapers article that made reference to the fraudulent counter-affidavit is not a prior bad act, but a new bad act that Claimant could not have mentioned in her federal lawsuits because the event had not taken place; that the publishing of the article containing reference to the fraudulent counter-affidavit is a new act of fraud upon the court by Defendant's judiciary employee and is illegal; that fraud upon the court has no statute of limitations; that Claimant alleges that its judiciary employee's refusal to charge the perpetrating litigant with perjury precipitated yet another separate bad acts for which res judicata does not legally, or logically apply.

       15)     That Claimant alleges that any substantial prejudice to Defendant State of New York was caused by its own illegal acts; that any delay preventing Claimant from filing her claim in a timely manner was caused by crimes Claimant has proven were caused by the Defendant.

       16)     That considering Defendant's outright criminal behavior with regarding to its judiciary employees, Claimant alleges that she has no other remedy.

       17)     That this Court's allowing Claimant to file her claim does not prejudice the Defendant..

       18)     That Defendant judiciary employee's use of a widely-read newspaper to disseminate a fraudulent document for which Defendant's judiciary employee failed to make an arrest for perjury while holding Claimant hostage to prevent Claimant from filing complaints has continued to prejudiced the Claimant and her daughter insofar Defendant's “courthouse source” published a fictitious name that still remains on the Claimant's daughter's birth certificate (see Exhibits E and F).

       19)     That Claimant asserts that Defendant has “unclean hands” with respect to the subject of this claim, and as such, does not have a legal right to demand equity.

       20)     That Claimant asserts that based on her limited knowledge of law, that the Defendant, after having Claimant placed in one of its own mental health facilities, that another one of Defendant's facilities – one that adjudges law – would violate the spirit of Title II, Americans with Disabilities Act and hold Claimant liable for having a mental dysfunction for which Defendant prevented Claimant from appearing in court.

       21)     That Defendant State of New York has, by its judiciary employees, engaged in fraud upon the court which took place after after the lawsuits that Claimant filed with the Eastern District and Southern District court such that if Defendant State of New York uses res judicata to refer to events that could not have been mentioned in Claimant's federal actions because they did not happen, then Defendant will be engaging in fraud.

       22)     That Claimant is familiar with the principal in the federal case Weldon v. United States of America, 70 F.3d 1, 64 USLW 2311; that Claimant, believing the law to be consistent, asserts that New York State law also bars fraud upon the court based on res judicata; that Claimant's desire is to obey the law, that this Court obeys the law and not be used as a machine to commit fraud or hide fraud for “favored” litigants; that Defendant's desire is not to obey the law, but to create new law that fixes cases to protect Jewish defendants from non-Jewish plaintiffs based on the Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b's doctrine that prevent Jews from telling on other Jews, and based on the Talmud's Baba Kamma's doctrine that permits Jews to lie to non-Jews in legal settings, so as to make their acts of fraud, if not legal, at least not punishable.

        WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court grants permission for Claimant to file her claim late and for such other and further relief as to this Court seem just and proper.


Cheryl D. Uzamere


You know why section entitled "Defendant's Attorney" is blank?
Because defendant/attorney did not file an appearance pursuant to CPLR §320
Corrupt judges failed to declare that defendant defaulted pursuant to CPLR §3215 and NYCRR §202.27


You know why section entitled "Defendant's Attorney" is blank?
Because defendant/attorney did not file an appearance pursuant to CPLR §320
Corrupt judges failed to declare that defendants defaulted pursuant to CPLR §3215 and NYCRR §202.27