Gwen's dumb-assed response: (First
Affirmative Defense) * * Victim's explanation of response: * * * * * Gwen's dumb-assed response: (Second
Affirmative Defense) * * * Victim's explanation of response: * * * * * * * * * * * * * Gwen's dumb-assed response: (Third Affirmative Defense) * ** * * * * * Victim's explanation of response: * * * * * * * * * * * * * Gwen's dumb-assed response: (Fourth Affirmative Defense) * * Victim's explanation
of response: | Fifth: The injuries or damages complained
of were caused in whole or part by claimant's own culpable conduct: * "Nigger
wacko" victim's symptoms of mental illness caused "one courthouse source" to disclose individually identifiable
health information about the aforesaid "wacko" victim to the public via the Daily News. It was the "nigger
wacko" victim's fault. * Sixth: The defendant through its employees,
acted properly, lawfully, without malice, with reasonable and probable cause, in good faith and with legal justification. * The State of New York, through the act of a corrupt Jew described in the Daily News as "one courthouse
source" acted properly by: 1) providing the Daily News with a falsified counter-affidavit that fraudulently identified
"nigger wacko's ex-husband as "Godwin Uzamere" that New York State Judge Sunshine found to be fraudulent; and
2) the State of New York, through the act of an employee described in the Daily News as "one courthouse source",
acted properly by violating HIPAA's laws regarding privacy by disclosing "nigger wacko's" individually identifiable
health information to the public via the Daily News. * * Seventh:
Defendant through its agents and/or employees took actions which were privileged as being judicial, quasi-judicial or discretionary
determinatiuons made by such agents or employees while acting within the scope of their duties as public officials and therefore
defendant from any liabiity for such actions. * * Defendant through its corrupt
Jewish agents and/or corrupt Jewish employees took actions which were privileged by Talmudic/halachic law as being Jewdicial,
quasi-Jewdicial or other discretionary determinations made by such corrupt Jewish agents or corrupt Jewish employees while
acting within the scope of their duties as enforcers of Talmudic/halachic law to ensure compliance with the Law of the Moser,
so that Defendant, by its corrupt Jewish public officials are immune from any liabiity associated with non-Jewish,
secular law. * * Eighth:
The acts complained of are privileged in nature in that they are activities mandated by statute in the course of the defendant's
business for which the defendant has an absolute or qualified privilege. * * We know that the acts complained
of by the "nigger wacko" are privileged in nature by HIPAA privacy laws; however, we as corrupt Jews are beholden
to non-Jew secular law when it benefits us; when it doesn't we use Talmudic/halachic law or subterfuge. Defendants'
activities that we say are mandated are mandated by Talmudic/halachic law. Talmudic/halachic law gives us privilege
to do what we want. We pay non-Jewish, secular law no mind at all. We are Ashkenazi Jews. We are above the non-Jewish,
secular law. |
