1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. A Real Man

click here for msg to Judge Prus

After 30 Years of Euro-Judaic, Anti-Schvartze Abuse --
Helpless Schvartze's Complaints  About Amoral Judge Jeffrey Sunshine,
Amoral Judge Eric Prus, Immigration Attorneys Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro
Still Unanswered By Uncaring White Appellate Judiciary
 judgeprudenti.jpg uzamerewalkerfamily.jpg Klonick.jpg


Can a judge place a case on trial calender if the defendant has never appeared?

Answer:  Hell no!  Without reasonable excuse and meritorious defense, default must be declared! 

Statutory Law:  NYCRR §202.27 -- At any scheduled call of a calendar or at any conference, if all parties do not appear and proceed or announce their readiness to proceed immediately or subject to the engagement of counsel, the judge may note the default on the record and enter an order as follows: (a) If the plaintiff appears but the defendant does not, the judge may grant judgment by default or order an inquest.

Case Law:  Ordinarily, where court grants judgment to plaintiff based upon defendant's default in appearing at conference, default may be vacated only if defendant can demonstrate both reasonable excuse for default in appearing and meritorious defense. Tragni v. Tragni, 21 A.D.3d 1084, 803 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2d Dep't 2005).


Are both parties and attorneys required to attend the preliminary conference during a divorce proceeding?

Answer:  Hell, yes! 

Statutory Law:  NYCRR 202.16(f)(1)(vi):  (vi) Both parties personally must be present in court at the time of the conference, and the judge personally shall address the parties at some time during the conference.

Case Law:  In matrimonial action, court held that pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 202.16(f), parties must appear with their attorneys at preliminary conference which was required under this section. Qi v. Ng, 166 Misc. 2d 195, 632 N.Y.S.2d 757 (Sup 1995).


Can a judge grant an adjournment for a defendant to retain an attorney if defendant's sole purpose for retaining attorney is to commit  a crime or an act of fraud on the court?

Answer: Hell, no?  Clients cannot retain an attorney to perpetrate a fraud or other crime.

Statutory Law:  DR §1-102(A)(1)(4) A lawyer or law firm shall not...engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Statutory Law:  DR 2-110[C][1][g]:  Except as stated in DR 2-110 [1200.15](A), a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if withdrawal can be accomplished...if...the client...has used the lawyer's services to perpetrate a crime or fraud.

Case Law:  Defendant's attorneys were allowed to withdraw from representation where defendant continually questioned attorneys' work, blamed them for adverse decisions, made threats against firm, and insisted that firm pursue legal theories and arguments directly contrary to law and attorneys' professional judgment, thereby rendering it unreasonably difficult for attorneys to carry out representation effectively for purposes of 22 NYCRR § 1200.15(c)(1)(i), (iv). Bankers Trust Co. v. Hogan, 187 A.D.2d 305, 589 N.Y.S.2d 338 (1st Dep't 1992).


If New York State statutory law and accompanying case law support Plaintiff's argument that Judge Sunshine must declare a default against Defendant, why hasn't Judge Sunshine done so?  Why haven't Judge Klonick of New York State's Commission on Judicial Conduct and Judge A. Gail Prudenti of New York State Supreme Court's Appellate Division prevented him from violating Plaintiff's constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the law?


It appears that Judge Sunshine and others of his ethnocentric persuasion are obeying group of religious laws --Halachic laws (Talmudic legal interpretation) in violation of the First Amendment's doctrine regarding separation between Church and State.

goldrightarrow.gifBabylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Kamma, 113agoldleftarrow.gif

"Where a suit arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: 'This is our law'; so also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and say [to the other party:] 'This is your law'; but if this can not be done, we use subterfuges to circumvent him."

goldrightarrow.gifStealing or deceiving a Gentile is permittedgoldleftarrow.gif

The error of a Gentile [i.e., property of which he deprived himself due to an error] is permitted, similar to the case of his lost item.Thus it is explained in Bava Kama 113b: "Shmuel said: and his error is permitted." However, the Rishonim disagree about whether it speaks of a case where a Gentile erred in his calculation on his own or if it is permitted to deceive him. In the opinion of Rashi, there (s.v. v'ivla lei zuza) it is permitted to deceive him, in accordance with Rashi's opinion which was clarified above, that stealing from a Gentile is permitted. The Tosaphot also wrote there, s.v. ya'chol, that it is permitted to deceive a Gentile, however only if he cannot discover it and it won't cause a desecration of G-d's name. This is also the opinion of the Tur in Choshen Mishpat, paragraph 348, section 3: "However, his error -- that is, to deceive him in calculations or to raise his loan -- is permitted, but only if it will not become evident to him -- for in such a situation there is no desecration of G-d's name."

goldrightarrow.gifBabylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah Zarah 26bgoldleftarrow.gif

"...informers, and apostates may be cast in, and need not be brought up."

goldrightarrow.gifInforming on Jews Whom Commit Crimesgoldleftarrow.gif

"Even though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law."

goldrightarrow.gifBabylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 108bgoldleftarrow.gif

"Our Rabbis taught: Three copulated in the ark, and they were all punished — the dog, the raven, and Ham. The dog was doomed to be tied, the raven expectorates [his seed into his mate's mouth] and Ham was smitten in his skin."

goldrightarrow.gifCommentary on Artsot Ha-Hayyim, page 52 (by Dov Ber Schwartz)goldleftarrow.gif

"In 1992 a book was published by a leading member of the Satmar community entitled Artzot Ha-Hayyim. On p. 52 he explains, and quotes other rabbis, that the reason Abraham Lincoln was killed was because he freed the blacks. this is also the reason why Kennedy was killed, i.e. because he was good to the blacks. He continues by saying that this will be the fate of any who adopt a progressive attitude towards blacks, because they are meant to be enslaved. His source for this is Ham's curse."


Plaintiff has all this proof.  Why won't the New York State Judiciary help her?  Why does it refuse to see that two years of judges adjourning a divorce action on behalf of a defendant who has never interposed an answer, submitted a signed document or appeared in person is illegal?


Because Plaintiff is a poor, worthless nigger.