Since filing the request for child and spousal support against Senator Uzamere, the case has experienced some temporary setbacks. While both were
temporary, the first one was not a problem because it was caused by a natural operation of law, and made obvious by a
very astute and kind judge, the Honorable R. Richard Spegele, Support Magistrate for Family Court. Judge Spegele took
the time to explain that since I requested child and spousal support in the divorce action in Supreme Court, I could not bring
the same legal issues to both courts. He went so far as to get the index number and judge's name of the divorce
action so as to ensure that both the law and my rights were not being violated. He went beyond the call of duty
by explaining that if the divorce action ended, I could come to family court back and prepare another petition.
Considering the trouble
that I still have trying to litigate my own case in Supreme Court before Judge Prus, I am thankful to have had a
judge as considerate and efficient as Judge Spegele.
Bringing my case before Judge Prus is another matter. After having Judge Spegele's office quickly prepare the dismissal
order and submitting it with my application to vacate the stay that I requested along with evidence of Senator Uzamere's glaring action of identity and green-card-marriage fraud, I innocently believed that all I need to do was submit my papers to the court and wait for Judge Prus to make a decision
on the application to vacate the stay and restore the case to the matrimonial calendar, the order to show cause
for child and spousal support and the affidavit in support of my motion for child and spousal support.
However, I was in for a very rude -- and illegal awakening.
Judge Prus' part clerk, along with various members of the 10th
floor Matrimonial Division told me that Judge Prus stated that he would not accept any other papers from me before September
29, 2008. When I explained to the judge's part clerk that Judge Prus' own stay order stated that "unless
plaintiff makes application to vacate such stay prior there." I explained that in compliance to the judge's
order I needed to submit the documentation before September 29, 2008.
Incidentally, September 29, 2008 is five days after the six-month
time period that Judge Prus allowed for me to effect discovery (find proof) regarding the allegations I made against my Senator
Uzamere. Submitting any documentation after the last date to effect discovery -- especially when Judge Prus did not
put his order for me not to submit any other documents in writing, I would have no proof and no legal recourse to
submit the documents.
Seeing what I believed to be a glaring inequity regarding Judge Prus' written order dated March 24, 2008
in which he granted me the right to make application to vacate the stay order prior to September 29, 2008 and the spoken
order that came from his staff but that I did not see come from him, there was no other recourse but to file a complaint
against Judge Prus with the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, the Honorable A. Gail Prudenti, Administrative
Judge for the Supreme Court Appellate, 2nd Circuit, the Honorable Jacqueline W. Silberman, Deputy Administrative Judge for
Matrimonial Matter for all of New York State and the Honorable Abraham Gerges, Interim Administrative Judge for the New
York State Supreme Court, Kings County.
Judge Prus was the last individual that I notified.
Why would Judge Prus willingly allow my request to place a stay on the divorce action to allow time for discovery,
going so far as to include "unless plaintiff makes application to vacate such stay prior thereto" and
then verbally refuse to allow me make to application to vacate the stay when I now have evidence of my allegation?
Is the judge's refusal to allow me to place evidence of my husband's crimes and my husband's own refusal to produce
evidence of his crimes a coincidence?
I do not think so.
I made arrangements to mail my documents to the court via certified mail so that if anyone in the court refuses to sign for
the documents, I will have proof. On July 31, 2008, when I spoke with Judge Gerges' law clerk, she stated that the
court would accept my papers.
Weeks later, in September, I submitted subpoenas for Judge Prus to sign. Every person whom I planned to subpoena
are witnesses to my husband's identity. Guess what? According to Judge Prus' part clerk, Judge Prus refused
to sign the subpoenas. Later, his part clerk called me back and left a message with me tell me to call him back.
When I called back, the part clerk explained that I needed to provide an affidavit as to why I needed the subpoenas.
He also stated that Judge Prus needed to check the subpoenas for "form."
Form? What the hell is "form?" I
did not invent something new. I printed a subpoena that I cut and pasted from another subpoena after adding
my own information. I am not an attorney. I copy what attorneys do. Why does Judge Prus need to check for
form? Why was I able to have another judge without his having to check for form?
What gives?
I called the offices of Interim Administrative
Judge Abraham Gerges, a judge belonging to the same ethnocentric group as Judge Prus, an ethnocentric group that believes
that it is wrong for one member of the group to be a moser, that is an informant, and report the unlawful acts of a fellow member of the group.
What is the likelihood that, based on the information regarding
the word moser that anyone belonging to the same ethnocentric group as Judge Prus will report him and grant me the justice I deserve?
Justice is the domain
of Jehovah -- not man. With Jehovah's help, everything is possible.
