1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. A Real Man

Is The End Finally In Sight?
Will Eugene Uzamere Risk A Great Legal Career To Save His Selfish, Law-Breaking Uncle?
Disloyal Uncle --
Sacrifices child/family for own needs
Loyal Nephew --
Risks life/career for uncle

February 20, 2009


Eugene Osato Uzamere, Esq.
Senior Partner
Uzamere and Associates, PLLC
1851 Watson Avenue
Bronx, NY  10472


Subject:  Uzamere vs. Uzamere, App. Div. Dock. No. 2009-011119
Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. Index No. 26332-07
Dear Eugene:

        I wish to give you, and those to whom I sent this correspondence one more opportunity to refute my allegations that: 1) Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere is my husband; 2) the names "Ehigie Edobor Uzamere" and "Godwin E. Uzamere" belong to my husband; and, 3) Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere is the biological father of our daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere.

        If you believe that any of the individuals to whom I have sent this correspondence can provide you with proof to successfully refute my allegations, you have until February 27, 2009 to obtain it.  If Senator Uzamere does not respond to the Order to Show Cause and accompanying Affidavit that was served on you February 18, 2009, my soon-to-be ex-husband will forever be precluded from challenging my allegations at the Supreme Court appellate level or in any other forum where the issues regarding his identity and the crimes I allege your client committed against my family are raised.

        Further to this, I have uploaded a similar copy of this letter to to ensure that all who receive it know that potentially, the eyes of the world are watching what you do. Moreover, please be aware that if you foolishly choose to challenge my assertions, my brief is already prepared, and the Appellate Division will more than likely allow me to perfect on the original papers and prepare the record on appeal – giving the court the opportunity to review the entire case – and its glaring lack of signed, notarized documentation from your client.

        Each appellate intervention concerning my divorce action means that more judges will see that the counter-affidavit you submitted to Judge Sunshine is a foreign document that has not been notarized by the U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria, in violation of 18 USC 3492, 22 C.F.R. 92.31 and 22 C.F.R. 92.65.

        Is this really what you want?  Do you want to sacrifice your good name and career for a corrupt politician who selfishly sacrificed: 1) his firstborn child; 2) his pregnant first wife; 3) his second wife and the real love of his life, Iriagbonse Irowa; 4) Ethel, who lied to sponsor him; 5) Egheosa, who wasn't even born when your client commenced his crime spree; 6) George, who paid Tara's car note on Ehigie's behalf, and now you? Do you want to go to jail for perjury?

        If you answered "no" to all these questions, I implore you:  Use your conscience and commonsense and back down now. Continue loving Ehigie – but do not allow the consequences of his wicked past to ruin your chances for a good name and a good life.  You are young.  You are intelligent.  You are reasonably good-looking. You are educated.  Do not give up the gifts Jehovah gave you to try to rescue your uncle from the legal consequences of identity fraud and non-support of the beautiful daughter that Jehovah gave him when he was a young man like you.

        Sometimes, a non-swimmer who ventures too far can get caught in a strong current.  As long as he can keep his head above water and scream for help, a strong swimmer can use his skills to save him.  But once he goes under, and can no longer be seen or heard screaming, the only choice, painful as it may be, is to let him go.  He cannot be saved -- and if the attempt is made to save him, the non-swimmer may grab hold of the strong swimmer and cause him to drown too. This is Ehigie's present situation. You can no longer save him.

        Allen Kaye and Harvey Shapiro, the racist immigration attorneys whose religious culture advocates the hatred of dark-skinned Hamites/Cushites/Canaanites/schvartzes (Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 108b, and footnote 34,,; Midrash Rabbah, page 293, Legend of the Jews, Volume I, page 169, Artsot Ha-Hayyim, page 52a and 52b,, brainwashed Ehigie horribly. These racist scumbags, in their one-sided, ground-scrounging quest to make a quick dollar, took advantage of a young, desperate, impressionable African boy, and turned him into an American-schvartze-hating, Euro-Judaic bigot with African-colored-skin. Ehigie's present actions now show that he hates Tara -- the precious fruit of his own African loins even more than his racist attorneys do.

        Sadly, both you and Ehigie have followed in the footsteps of politically influential Euro-Judaic bigots Allen Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Lynden Melmed, Jack Gladstein, Thomas A. Klonick, Robert Morgenthau and Robert Juceam and not offered my daughter Tara even one penny toward her college fees and living expenses. Although Tara is an Uzamere by blood, your and Ehigie's hatred of her African American ancestry mimics the rationalized hatred these wicked Jews use when they train their green-card-challenged clients to trick naïve African Americans into marriage, only to swindle them, or when they huddle together to form legal strategies to cover their asses when they have been caught violating a schvartze's legal rights.

        You are now warned: The consequences of Ehigie's wicked life are way over his head, with no way for you to see clearly how to save him.  Let him go or you, and your career will drown with him – like the careers of those wicked Jews your client hired to try to screw me.

        May Jehovah God, through the precious blood of his only-begotten Son Jesus Christ bless you and your family always.

Cheryl D. Uzamere
 Phone No.:
 Fax No.:
E-mail Address:
Hon. Robin Renee Sanders, USDOS  
FBI Attaché to Nigeria, USDOJ
Hon. Janet Napolitano, USDHS
Hon. Eric H. Holder, USDOJ
Hon. John P. Torres, USICE
Eugenia Cowles, USDOJ
Lynden Melmed, USCIS
Rachel McCarthy, USCIS
Lev Dassin, USDOJ
Benton J. Campbell, USDOJ
Alexander Killie, USICE
Paul Brunhuber, USDOJ
Hon. Thomas A. Klonick, NYCJC
Hon. Roy L. Reardon, NYDDC
Hon. Robert Morgenthau, NYDA
Hon. Charles Hynes, BKDA
Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq.
Allen E. Kaye, Esq.
Harvey Shapiro, Esq.
Jack Gladstein, Esq.
Robert E. Juceam, Esq.
Hon. Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
Hon. Samuel Saba, Code Conduct
Int'l Ctr for Nigerian Law
Nigerian Bar Association

15 out of 21 Black Children
Chooses "Good" White Doll
Over "Bad" Black Doll

Enraged Whites Harass
Black American Ms. Eckford
On The Way To School


Black American Whipped
Like a Worthless, Mangy Dog --
...Whipped Like A Canaanite


Experiment Conducted In England --
Most Black Children Choose
"Good" White Doll Over "Bad" Black Doll

Euro-Judaic Past Use of The Curse of Ham/Canaan (Midrash Rabbah, Page 293):

"R. Nehemiah was Canaan...the curse is attached to him...R. Huna said in R. Joseph's name...your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned."

Euro-Judaic Present-Day Use of The Curse of Ham/Canaan:

"Ahigee, all you have to do is get one of those black American niggers and marry her.  Don't worry...they all use drugs and don't wanted to be educated like us.  When you marry her, make sure you have sex with her on the wedding night so it looks like a real marriage to immigration.  If she gets pregnant???  Don't worry, welfare will pay for her to have an abortion.  If the stupid nigger doesn't want an abortion, say the child isn't yours.  And, oh yes Ahigee, don't forget to bring the fee the next time you come."



Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Cheryl D. Uzamere                                           AFFIDAVIT

                                 Plaintiff-Appellant,           Docket No. 2009-011119

               - against -                                         Sup. Ct. Kings County

Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, a.k.a.             Index No. 26332-07

"Godwin Uzamere"

COUNTY OF KINGS           )     ss:

        I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, being duly sworn, depose and say:

        1)   That I am the Plaintiff in the above entitled action.

        2)   That I make this Affidavit based on the following allegations:

        3)   That as Plaintiff in the Kings County Supreme Court case Index No. 26332/07, I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this matter, as I am the person who commenced the subject action.

        4)   That my marriage is part of a series of crimes that the Defendant committed to circumvent U.S. immigration laws, to wit:

             (a) United States Code Title 8: Aliens and Nationality – Misrepresentation and Concealment of facts: Any alien who... (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

             (b)  United States Code Title 8: Aliens and Nationality – Marriage fraud: Any individual who knowingly enters into marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.

             (c) New York State Penal Code -- §260.05 -- Non-support of a child in the second degree: A person is guilty of non-support of a child when, being a parent, guardian or other person legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than sixteen years old, he fails or refuses without lawful excuse to provide support for such child when he is able to do so, or becomes unable to do so, when, though employable, he voluntarily terminates his employment, voluntarily reduces his earning capacity or fails to diligently seek employment. Non-support of a child in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor.

             (d) New York State Penal Code -- §255.15 – Bigamy: A person is guilty of bigamy when he contracts or purports to contract a marriage with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse. Bigamy is a Class E felony.

             (e)  New York State Penal Code -- §175.35 -- Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree: A person is guilty of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree when, knowing that a written instrument contains a false statement or false information, and with intent to defraud the state or any political subdivision, public authority or public benefit corporation of the state, he offers or presents it to a public office, public servant, public authority or public benefit corporation with the knowledge or belief that it will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of such public office, public servant, public authority or public benefit corporation. Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree is a Class E felony.

             (f) New York State Penal Code -- §210.10 Perjury in the second degree: A person is guilty of perjury in the second degree when he swears falsely and when his false statement is (a) made in a subscribed written instrument for which an oath is required by law, and (b) made with intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official functions, and (c) material to the action, proceeding or matter involved. Perjury in the second degree is a class E felony.

             (g) New York State Penal Code -- §210.15 Perjury in the first degree: A person is guilty of perjury in the first degree when he swears falsely and when his false statement (a) consists of testimony, and (b) is material to the action, proceeding or matter in which it is made. Perjury in the first degree is a class D felony.

        5)   That according to Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, (802-660-5043, job, 802-660-5067, fax), Defendant's IR2 residence based on his status as “Ehigie Edobor Uzamere”, date of birth December 31, 1960, unmarried and under 21 years of age was revoked because he was married to me as “Godwin Ehigie Uzamere”, date of birth June 1, 1955.

        6)  That Defendant's attorney, Eugene O. Uzamere, has suborned Defendant's perjury and has himself committed perjury as it relates to the Defendant's identity; that the Defendant has never appeared in court; that both Defendant and his attorney have consistently refused to submit Defendant's immigration records; and that it appears that the ultimate goal of Defendant and the lower court is to deprive me of my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process as they pertain to discovery of Defendant's identity and discovery of Defendant's immigration records.

        7) That 18 USC §4 says “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both”; and that every appellate judge who reviews this Affidavit is required by federal law to obey it.

        8)  That I have a pending federal lawsuit with regard to Defendant's commission of the aforementioned crimes; and that further to this, I have submitted irrefutable proof of same in this Affidavit.

        9)  That I will exercise my First Amendment right to seek legal redress of my grievances with regard to the handling of this instant action by amending my federal lawsuit and naming as defendants any appellate judge and responding attorney of the New York State Attorney General's Office if there are any delays in the adjudication of this instant action, or if its adjudication is indicative of bias, bribery or any other form of illegal influence.

       10)  That it would be unjust and illegal for this Court to view my attempts to defend myself as anything other than legal, just and within the scope of the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.

       11)  That as the Petitioner of this instant action and the Plaintiff of the divorce action that precipitated its filing, I hereby state that the following is true and correct:


       12)  That Petitioner submitted a Verified Petition and Reply to Respondent with regard to her Appellate Division, 2nd Judicial Department motion, Docket No. 2008-9190.

       13)  That at the time of Petitioner's filing of the instant action, the Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine had not rendered a decision to Petitioner's motions for retroactive child support and spousal support, default judgment and money judgment.

       14)  That on January 12, 2008, the lower court rendered its decision, that inter alia, incorrectly denied Petitioner's request for default judgment; 2) incorrectly denied the Plaintiff's request for retroactive child support and 3) placed an abeyance of retroactive spousal support pending identification of the Defendant (see Exhibit A).

If Court Favors Disposition on The Merits, Court Must Render Default

        A)   Plaintiff Has Sufficiently Established Defendant's Identity

       15)  That the lower court's decision and order in which it states that “the opposition submitted by defendant raises a genuine issue as to whether or not plaintiff and defendant were married in the first instance” is incorrect.

       16)  That based on correspondence I received from the New York State Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department, the Defendant's immigration attorney Allen E. Kaye stated: “I recently talked to John Uzamere (718-345-1931), who informed me that as a U.S. citizen he sponsored Ehigie E. Uzamere for an immigrant visa and that was how Ehigie became a permanent resident...Somehow, I am being drawn into a divorce action that Ms. Uzamere would like to file against her husband” (see Exhibit B).

       17)  That Allen Kaye's letter bears the stamp of the New York State Departmental Disciplinary, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department.

       18)  That the aforesaid agency is administered by the Supreme Court, Appellate Division; and that Allen Kaye's statements “Ehigie E. Uzamere” and “her husband” are statements that Mr. Kaye made under oath to employees of a New York State judiciary body.

       19)  That Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service provided documentation regarding the Defendant's identity (see Exhibits C and D ).

       20)  That the Defendant inadvertently identified himself when he signed the marriage affidavit with the name “Ehigie Uzamere”; and that based on the above, I have sufficiently established the Defendant's identity and proven that Defendant is my husband (see Exhibit E).

        B)   Defendant Never Interposed an Answer and Has Therefore Defaulted

       21)  That the lower court's statement that “...defendant has failed to interpose an answer” is correct; that the summons states that “within thirty (30) days after the service is completed...and in case of your failure to appear, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the notice set forth below (see Exhibit F).

       22)  That although Defendant's place of employment is in close proximity of the U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria, he has never notarized even one affidavit for my divorce action.

       23)  That although Defendant's attorney claims that my imaginary husband “Cousin Godwin E. Uzamere” lives in Nigeria, like my real husband, the Defendant, he has made no attempt to notarize his counter-affidavit at the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria, where his identity and signature can be scrutinized and verified by the U.S. Department of State1; that Defendant's attorney used the aforesaid fraudulent document in open court although the document was not notarized by the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria for use in the United States (see Exhibit G).

       24)  That Defendant was served with a copy of the Preliminary Conference order on November 17, 2007 (see Exhibit H).

       25)  That the lower court's statement with regard to the Defendant that “he has submitted opposition to Plaintiff's motion for spousal and and child support, (has filed his own motion to dismiss, and has participated (through his attorney) in a preliminary conference” is incorrect.

       26) That is it well settled in Domestic Relations Law that, with reference to stipulations and agreements “Any stipulation or agreement between the parties which deals with equitable distribution, spousal support, child support, visitation, titles to real property...must be signed by the parties themselves (not their attorneys) before a Notary Public as an "acknowledgment.

       27)  That the preliminary conference stipulation to which the lower court's decision refers is signed by Defendant's attorney, not the Defendant (see Exhibit J).

       28) That Dom. Rel. §236 says that “provision for the amount and duration of maintenance or other terms and conditions of the marriage relationship...provided that such terms...are not unconscionable at the time of entry of final judgment.”

       29) That even if the lower court was able to accept the Defendant's attorney's signature in place of the Defendant's signature, the unconscionable nature of the preliminary conference stipulation would preclude the lower court from enforcing it as it denies me the retroactive child support for which I applied in 1980 and 1985; and it would violate my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process regarding the preliminary conference request that was served on Defendant on November 17, 2007.

       30)   That Dom. Rel. §236(4) states that with regard to compulsory financial disclosure: “In all matrimonial actions and proceedings in which alimony, maintenance or support is in issue, there shall be compulsory disclosure by both parties of their respective financial states. No showing of special circumstances shall be required before such disclosure is ordered.”

       31)  That in paragraphs 2-9 of my preliminary conference request, I demanded that the Defendant produce his financial records (see Exhibit I, page 1 and 2).

       32)  That in paragraphs 20 and 27 of my preliminary conference request, I demanded that the Defendant produce all immigration revocations and signed FOIA/FOIL disclosure forms, inter alia, immigration records to ascertain his identity (see Exhibit I, page 3).

       33)  That even if this Court believes that the Defendant “has a preliminary conference”, the form was not signed in front of a notary; and that the Defendant did not provide the most important element of my preliminary conference request – Defendant's immigration records for proof of identity.

Retroactive Support Due to Plaintiff Based on Discovery of Evidence of Defendant's Act of Fraud

       34)  That on page 10 of the lower court's decision and order, in which it states that “plaintiff is not entitled to...retroactive child support in this action inasmuch as his alleged child was 28 years old when plaintiff first sought this relief...” is incorrect.

       35)  That I attempted to obtain child support from the Defendant in April 1980 and in July 1985; that New York City's Child Support Enforcement Bureau conducted a search of the Defendant until the child of the marriage turned 21 years old; and that in an attempt to circumvent what I believed to be the lower court's bias in favor of the Defendant, I applied for child support around May 2008 with the Kings County Family Court (see Exhibit K).

       36)  That the lower court's scheduled“evidentiary hearing” would be biased and farcically named as such if it is conducted without evidence; that is, the evidence that exists in the Defendant's immigration records to establish that the Defendant is my husband.

       37)  Given that Allen E. Kaye, the Defendant's immigration attorney (212-964-5858(job); 212-608-3734(fax)) and Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel for USCIS ((802) 660-5043(job); (802) 660-5067(fax)) have provided documentation that the Defendant is my husband, given that I have provided this Court with telephone numbers that a judge or any law enforcement can verify; and given that 18 U.S.C. §4 requires the lower court to conduct, or to have commenced a criminal investigation based on the above, it should be obvious to this Court that the Defendant and his attorney have perjured themselves and have used whatever means is at their disposal to try to illegally influence the lower court.


       38)  The entire premise of my divorce action hinges on whether or not this Court will require the lower court to accept the irrefutable evidence that I have already presented regarding the identity of the Defendant; or whether this Court will require the lower court to enforce my constitutional right to due process as it pertains to discovery of the Defendant's identity – which, if this Court grants my request, will result in the lower court's obeying the words of the summons and declaring that the Defendant has defaulted.

       39)  That in the spirit of my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process via discovery, I have attached Exhibit L, a letter I faxed to Benton J. Campbell, U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of New York; and that said correspondence was also faxed to Lev Dassin, U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York, Robert Morgenthau, New York County District Attorney, Charles Hynes, Kings County District Attorney, Eugenia Cowles, Assistant U.S. Attorney for Vermont and Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service in Vermont.

       40)  That in the spirit of 18 U.S.C. §4, I sent an e-mail to the Honorable Robin Renee Sanders, U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria regarding the Defendant's act of identity fraud; that said e-mail was sent to various individuals; and that thus far, the following individuals have actually read the e-mail: The Honorable Robin Renee Sanders; Eugenia Cowles, AUSA, Vermont; Lynden D. Melmed, USCIS and the Defendant's immigration attorney Allen E. Kaye (see Exhibit M).

       41)  That in the spirit of my Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process with respect to discovery, I prepared an affidavit for the Defendant, hereby attached as Exhibit N, based on the affirmation and unnotarized counter-affidavit that Defendant's attorney fraudulently claims to be from “Cousin Godwin Ehigie Uzamere; that said affidavit and counter-affidavit must be signed by the Defendant and the imaginary “Cousin Godwin” in the presence of a consular agent of the U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria and notarized by same; and that I am positive that, based on the irrefutable evidence I have already submitted, the Defendant will not sign it, nor will he appear in court on March 30, 2009 for any "evidentiary hearing."

       42)  That attached as Exhibit O is my good faith attempt to ensure the veracity of my allegations regarding the Defendant's identity by faxing a memorandum to the Honorable Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and also to, among 18 other individuals, Rachel McCarthy, Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Robert E. Juceam and Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq.; from whom I alleged the attached documents emanated.

       43)  That although Rachel McCarthy was quick to file federal assault charges against me as shown in Exhibit O, she has yet to file even one charge against me claiming that I have fraudulently alleged that she admitted to the Defendant being my husband; and that the federal documents I alleged emanated from her are fraudulent.

       44)  That although Allen E. Kaye, one of the immigration attorneys whose name is on the I-130 relative sponsorship form was quick to accuse me of being an anti-Semite as shown in Exhibit O, he has yet to file even one charge against me in which he claims that I falsed alleged that he admitted that the Defendant is my husband; and that the document I alleged he sent to Mr. Cahill of the New York State Department Disciplinary Committee 1st Judicial Department is fraudulent and the signature on it is a forgery.

       45)  That although I uploaded the I-130 relative sponsorship form that contains Harvey Shapiro's name, Mr. Shapiro has made no attempt to have me arrested for forging a federal document with his signature; nor has he made any attempt to sue me for defamation of character.

       46)  That although Defendant's present attorney has openly and notoriously swore in his affirmation that “The presented by the plaintiff are...fraudulent” and that, “the plaintiff appears to be motivated by her desire to get money from Senator Uzamere”, he has made absolutely no attempt to have me arrested for the aforesaid “fraudulent” attempt “to get money from Senator Uzamere” by impersonating his wife.

       47)  That I can guarantee this Court that none of the individuals named in the fax will file charges of fraud or defamation of character against me, nor will the lower court willingly require the Defendant to submit himself for DNA testing to confirm paternity of the child of the marriage because the documents are authentic, and because the aforesaid individuals openly and notoriously admitted in the attached documents that the Defendant is my husband.

        WHEREFORE, I pray this that this Court grants me permission to proceed as a poor person; grants me permission to perfect on the original papers; orders the lower court to declare that the Defendant has defaulted or, if default is not immediately declared, to enjoin the lower court from granting its scheduled evidentiary hearing or any other adjournments or continuance unless Defendant produces a signed, original Affidavit with U.S.-government-issued attachments confirming his identity and the identity of “Cousin Godwin Ehigie Uzamere” that are notarized by a consular officer of the U.S. Embassy by March 7, 2009; for retroactive, present and future child and spousal support as specified in the summons and complaint and for such other and further relief as this court deems just and proper.



Cheryl D. Uzamere

1According to the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Consular Affairs, “the consular official must require the personal appearance of the person requesting the notarial service; establish the identity of the person requesting the service; establish that the person understands the nature, language and consequences of the document to be notarized; and establish that the person is not acting under duress.” (22 C.F.R. 92.31). Please refer to for more information.