|
|
|
Court Declares: "Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!" Embattled Judge Sunshine Schedules Trial For Defendant Senator Uzamere With NO Note of Issue, NO Certificate of Readiness and NO
Defendant Refuses Plaintiff's Due Process Right to Request
an Inquest Plaintiff/Identity Fraud Victim Files Federal Court of Appeals Temporary Restraining Order Will File Writ of Certiorari if Court of Appeals Judge Writes Biased Decision Plaintiff/Identity-Fraud to Broadcast Federal Court
of Appeal's Decision on Her Website
|
Cheryl D. Uzamere 1209 Loring Avenue Apt. 6B Brooklyn, NY 11208 Tel.: (718) 647-8370 Fax: (267) 543-3317 | FAX | TO: | The Honorable A. Gail Prudenti, Pres. Judge James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of Court The Honorable Barack H. Obama, President The Honorable Eric Holder, U.S. Atty General Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Mr. Whidbee Charles F. Sanders, Esq. The
Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine Eugenia Cowles, U.S.
Attorney, VT Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel, USCIS Michael A. Cardozo, Esq. Robert E. Juceam, Esq. Allen
E. Kaye, Esq. Harvey Shapiro Jack Gladstein, Esq. Bernard J. Rostanski, Esq. Eugene O. Uzamere,
Esq. Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere | FAX: | 1-718-855-2884 1-718-855-2884 1-202-456-2461 1-202-514-4507 1-212-857-8710 1-212-416-6075 1-718-643-7655 1-802-951-6540 1-802-660-5067 1-212-788-0367 1-212-859-4000 1-212-608-3734 1-718-793-0524 1-9170604-7232 1-718-504-5326 | SUBJECT: | Judge
Sunshine is illegally forcing a trial on me in violation on my due process rights | DATE: | May 27, 2009 | Dear Judge Prudenti and Mr. Pelzer: Please
note the following: I filed Appellate Division Docket Number 2009-01119 with the 2nd Judicial Department in which I provided irrefutable
proof that I am a victim of a crime still in progress. In spite of this, your court has chosen not to respond to my appeal
expeditiously, thereby forcing me to undergo even more mental and emotional distress.
Judge Sunshine forcibly and illegally scheduled a trial for July 7, 2009 to dispose of
issues that are now under appeal in your court. I believe he is doing to this to render my appeal moot, and to rush the case
out of his court because of crimes that he has committed (i.e., accepting as "genuine" the fraudulent
foreign counter-affidavit). In addition, because my divorce action's files are still with your court there is no
proof of what I presented to the lower court.
I have taken the liberty of uploading this information
to the internet. I want the world to know that abject corruption and racism I have faced in trying to obtain justice from
your court and from the lower court. One thing I've learned through thirty years
of torture -- there are still white bigots in this world and sometime the courts are not enough to stop them. Sometimes one needs force. Cheryl D. Uzamere |
|
May 12, 2009 d The Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine Justice New York State Supreme Court 360 Adams Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Your Honor: I respectfully request that this Court schedules an inquest based on the following laws, facts and unresolved
issues: Laws: NYCRR 202.16(k)(5) -- The failure to comply with
the provisions of this subdivision shall be good cause...to draw an inference favorable to the adverse party with respect
to any disputed fact or issue affected by such failure; NYCRR
202.46(b) Damages, inquest after default; proof -- In any action where it is necessary
to take an inquest before the court, the party seeking damages may submit the proof required by oral testimony of witnesses
in open court or by written statements of the witnesses, in narrative or question-and-answer form, signed and sworn to. NYCRR 202.27(a) Defaults -- At any scheduled
call of a calendar or at any conference...If the plaintiff appears but the defendant does not, the judge
may grant judgment by default or order an inquest; CPLR 3215(a)
(a) Default and entry -- When a defendant has failed to appear, plead or proceed to trial of an action
reached and called for trial, or when the court orders a dismissal for any other neglect to proceed, the plaintiff
may seek a default judgment against him; Dom.
Rel. 236(b) Marital Property -- The term "marital property" shall mean all property acquired by either
or both spouses during the marriage and before...the commencement of a matrimonial action, regardless
of the form in which title is held. Dom. Rel. 236(B)(4)(a)
Compulsory financial disclosure -- In all matrimonial actions and proceedings
in which alimony, maintenance or support is in issue, there shall be compulsory disclosure
by both parties of their respective financial states...Noncompliance shall be punishable
by any or all of the penalties prescribed in section thirty-one hundred twenty-six of the civil practice law and
rules, in examination before or during trial. CPLR §3126
Penalties for refusal to comply with order or to disclose -- If any party...willfully fails to disclose information
which the court finds ought to have been disclosed pursuant to this article, the court...order
that the issues to which the information is relevant shall be deemed resolved for purposes of the action in
accordance with the claims of the party obtaining the order; or render a judgment by default against the disobedient
party; CPLR §2308(a) Disobedience of a judicial subpoena
-- Failure to comply with a subpoena issued by a judge, clerk or officer of the court shall be punishable
as a contempt of court. CPLR §2304 Motion to quash, fix
conditions or modify -- A motion to quash, fix conditions or modify a subpoena shall be made promptly
in the court in which the subpoena is returnable.
Facts
Presented in Federal and State Appeals Regarding Plaintiff: Plaintiff properly served process on Defendant; Plaintiff submitted documentation regarding Defendant's wealth; Plaintiff has pending federal lawsuit awaiting appeal; Plaintiff has pending appeal with Appellate Division, 2nd Judicial
Department; Plaintiff has sent several
letters of complaint to President Obama; Plaintiff
presented similar issues in both appeals; Plaintiff
is mentally disabled; Plaintiff is 50 years old; Plaintiff is poor; Plaintiff submitted proof that she applied for child support in 1980 and 1985; Plaintiff is mother of Defendant's firstborn adult daughter; Plaintiff never received spousal or child support; Plaintiff owes several bills, including Federal and New York State
student loans.
Facts Presented
in Federal and State Appeals Regarding Defendant: Defendant never interposed an answer (or any other response bearing his notarized signature); Defendant lied about his identity; Defendant did not appear for any of the two preliminary conferences; Defendant did not cooperate with regard to compulsory disclosure
of his assets; Defendant hired immigration
attorneys Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro to lie about his identity; Defendant disobeyed disclosure law; Defendant attended Pratt Institute's School of Architecture at Higgins Hall in Brooklyn, New York. Defendant
received a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Architecture around October 1983; Defendant is a senator in Nigeria.
Fact Regarding Subpoenaed Witnesses: Immigration attorney Allen E. Kaye disobeyed subpoena; did not file motion to quash; Immigration attorney Harvey Shapiro disobeyed subpoena; did not
file motion to quash; Attorney Robert
E. Juceam disobeyed subpoena; did not file motion to quash; George I. Uzamere disobeyed subpoena; did not file motion to quash; Ethel Uzamere disobeyed subpoena; did not file motion to quash; Egheosa Uzamere disobeyed subpoena; did not file motion to quash.
Facts Presented in Federal and State Appeals Regarding
Court: Court overstepped its judicial boundaries by scheduling
adjournments that lacked a good excuse and meritorious defense on behalf of no-show Defendant pursuant to violation of CPLR
§3126, NYCRR §202.16 and NYCRR §202.27(a)); Court
overstepped its judicial boundaries by referring to fraudulent, unauthenticated foreign counter-affidavit as "geniuine
in violation of 22 C.F.R. §92.31 and 22 C.F.R. 92.65; Court overstepped
its judicial boundaries by not holding in contempt the following individuals for violating a court-ordered subpoena: Allen
E. Kaye; Harvey Shapiro; Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; George I. Uzamere; Ethel Uzamere and Egheosa Uzamere; That Court overstepped its judicial boundaries is evident by the
lack of statutory law and corresponding precedent-setting case law that supports the Court's actions based on the legal
doctrine of stare decisis.
Unresolved
Issues: (a) Pecuniary
demands: $20,000,000.00 (based on assets Defendant
chooses to disclose; egregiousness of Defendant's criminal acts against me and his daughter Tara); $5,000,000.00 (for spousal support during the pendency of the divorce action which I did not receive
based on court's continuedacts of bias which I have already reported to President Obama and in my federal lawsuit); financial
assistance for the adult child of the marriage for whom the Defendant never provided child support, including but not limited
to college fees, rent, food and car payments.
(b) Other Demands: To conduct a criminal investigation
against Defendant; To conduct a criminal investigation against immigration
attorneys Allen E. Kaye and Harvey based on the Court's decision that the Defendant is my husband; To hold Allen E. Kaye; Harvey Shapiro; Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; George I. Uzamere; Ethel Uzamere and Egheosa Uzamere
in contempt; To cease and desist from acting illegally based
on the Court's past belief that I am a dumb schvartze. Such an assumption is indicative of an individual who
is in want of commonsense since New York State Consolidated Laws, New York Codes, Rules and Regulations
(connected to WestLaw), free Lexis-Nexis, Findlaw.com, Fastcase.com and other legal research sites are available on the
internet.
The reason for this
detailed request is to ensure that this Court has no more "wiggle room" to render biased decisions that do not reflect
statutory law and accompanying case law. I have also uploaded to this letter to the internet and faxed it to U.S. Attorney
Lev Dassin. I believe that you and
other defendants in my federal lawsuit intentionally violated my First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights for the
primary purpose of preventing me from reporting fellow Ashkenazim Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro to the gentile authorities,
based on Talmudic doctrine. If you make any decision that violates my constitutional rights, I will forward it
to Mr. Obama and the U.S. Attorney General. I will display the decision on the internet for others to see and I will
appeal it -- even if it means writing a writ of certiorari for the Solicitor General to review. I respectfully ask that you remember that the Talmudic belief in the inferiority of dark skin is
the rationalization for the world's worst Holocaust -- The Maafa. Over several hundred years, millions
of my people forever lost the ability to bear the names of their African male forebears -- for nothing more than
to satiate the greed of rich Europeans -- both Christians and Ashkenazim. Allen Kaye's and Harvey Shapiro's
acts of perjury, racism and greed revisited on me and on my daughter the same racist rationalization of me and my daughter as
worthless "schvartzes" that their -- and your -- ancestors visited on helpless, kidnapped African slaves. Bastardizing an innocent African child by not acknowledging and enforcing
her right to paternity renders her a potential victim of incest. It denies her rights of inheritance based on legal
acknowledgement of paternity. Anyone who dares challenge my right as my child's mother to protect her biological and
legal rights to paternity had better be ready to fight me to the death. You can never do this to me or mine again. Remember the African Ancestors, Respectfully, 
Cheryl D. Uzamere African Diasporal Enterprises /cdu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A Senator
Uzamere and 2nd Wife Iriagbonse Irowa
|
|
Exhibit B (pg 1) Affidavit
and Application for License to Marry
|
|
Exhibit B (pg 2) Affidavit
and Application for License to Marry
|
|
Exhibit C Immigration
Form I-130
|
|
Exhibit D (pg 1) Allen
Kaye's Letter to NYS Disc. Cmte.
|
|
Exhibit D (pg 2) Allen
Kaye's Letter to NYS Disc. Cmte.
|
|
Exhibit E Defendant
Rachel McCarthy's Report
|
|
Exhibit F (pg 1) Fraudulent
Nigerian Counter-Affidavit
|
|
Exhibit F (pg 2) Fraudulent
Nigerian Counter-Affidavit
|
|
Exhibit G Judge
Sunshine's Decision and Order -- Pg 9 (dated January 12, 2009)
|
|
Exhibit H Judge
Sunshine's Decision and Order -- Pg 1 (dated May 12, 2009)
|
|
Exhibit H Judge
Sunshine's Decision and Order -- Pg 2 (dated May 12, 2009)
|
|
Rabbi Michael Broyde's Speech Prohibiting
Jews From Reporting Jews to Secular Law Enforcement Authorities
|
|
|
|
|
