|
What Will New York State's Commission On Judicial Conduct's
Response Be? Will Talmudic dogma cause Judge Klonick to protect fellow
Jew Judge Sunshine... | ...at the expense of denying justice to this poor, racially
oppressed schvartze family? |
February 23, 2009
New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct 61 Broadway New York, NY 10006 Attention: Hon. Thomas A. Klonick Subject: Uzamere vs. Sunshine Your Honor:
With reference to the above-captioned case, attached please find documentation that proves that the Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine,
the justice presiding over my divorce action is biased in favor of the defendant. First, please allow me to remind you that federal
law always takes precedent over state law, and that supplanting federal laws with Talmudic dogma violates the U.S. Constitution's
First Amendment's guarantee of separation of church and state. Here is a list of exhibits proving that Judge Sunshines has been illegally
influenced:
1) Exhibit A, Judge Sunshine's Decision and Order, page 9, dated January
12, 2009 states: “the opposition submitted by the defendant raises a genuine issue as to whether
or not plaintiff or defendant were married in the first instance” (emphasis added). 2) Exhibit
B, the counter-affidavit of “Cousin Godwin Ehigie Uzamere” of Nigeria, an unnotarized foreign document
purportedly submitted to defendant's attorney by an individual who is not a party to the act, and therefore a witness.
This document that Judge Sunshine refers to as the “opposition submitted by the defendant” is also described in
Exhibit A as “genuine.” 3) Exhibit C,
22 C.F.R. §92.65 says: “a diplomatic or consular officer may be commissioned
by a United States court to take the testimony of a witness in a foreign country...for the purpose of determining the genuineness
of any foreign document...” 4) Exhibit D, 22 C.F.R. §92.31 says: "A notarizing officer taking an
acknowledgment should always require the personal appearance of the...person...signed the instrument
to be acknowledged...failure to observe this requirement invalidates the notarial act and makes the officer liable to the
charge of negligence and of having executed a false certificate...The notarizing officer must be certain of the identity of
the parties making an acknowledgment...he should require...some evidence of identity, such as a passport, police identity
card, or the like." 5) Exhibit E,
Ballentine's Law Dictionary, Legal Assistant Edition, page 217: “genuine, real or original, as opposed to false,
fictitious, or counterfeit." 6)
Exhibit F, response from U.S. Embassy, Abuja, Nigeria: “Notarial services are executed by a Consular
Office and may include documents to be signed before them, statements made under oath...true copies...affidavits...and acknowledgments...the
only Notary Public that is recognized by the United States is a U.S. Consular Office at the Embassy.” Exhibit
G, Rabbi Broyde's Talmudic prohibition warning Jews not to report the crimes of fellow Jews to non-Jewish
authorities: "...it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular authorities, even when their conduct is
a violation of secular law..."
Based on the aforementioned federal laws that require the authentication of all foreign documents under penalty of punishment,
how did Judge Sunshine conclude that this foreign document – having never been presented to the U.S. Embassy to determine
it genuineness for authentication purposes – in violation of the aforementioned laws is, in fact, “genuine?”
Is that genuineness based on the genuineness of the money he was paid to decide in the defendant's favor, or the genuineness
of his “I-can-do-no-wrong” yiddishkeit? Your Honor, I don't expect you to do anything to change this obviously
illegal situation. Your Talmudic doctrine and the ensuing loyalty that it spawns in followers like you, Allen E. Kaye,
Harvey Shapiro, Jack Gladstein, Bernard Rostansky has screwed you so forcefully that quite a few of you are now blinded
by the religious/racist jism it has ejaculated in your fellating mouths. My only hope now is that my in forma pauperis
request is accepted by a non-Jewish judge in federal court so that I can amend my lawsuit to add you and your law-breaking
Jewish friend Judge Sunshine as defendants. I am sure the African Americans/Hamites/Cushites/Canaanites/schvartzes will get
a big kick from this letter – and from your response to it. Tell your Euro-Judaic friend Jeff that I uploaded a copy of
this letter and all attachments to http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com/what_will_their_response_be.html, and remind him that when he used the word “genuine” in reference to that unnotarized
foreign counter-affidavit that was submitted by my husband's attorney in violation of federal law, he should
have said “genuine piece of crap” instead. See you in federal court. Respectfully,
Cheryl D. Uzamere
/cdu
|
