|
How Will The New York State Departmental Disciplinary Committee Respond? Will Alan Friedberg's Sense of Loyalty Be Fueled By The U.S. Constitution -- Or By The Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26B Not To Report Fellow Jews Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro?
February 23, 2009
New York State Departmental Disciplinary Committee 1st Department 61 Broadway New York, NY 10006 Attention: Alan W. Friedburg Subject: Cheryl D. Uzamere vs. Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq. Dear Alan: With reference to the above-captioned case, attached please find documentation
that proves that attorney Eugene O. Uzamere violated federal law with regard to his submission of the attached unnotarized
and fraudulent foreign counter-affidavit document.
Here is a list of the attached exhibits:
Exhibit
A, Eugene O. Uzamere's fraudulent affirmation. Exhibit
B, the counter-affidavit of “Cousin Godwin Ehigie Uzamere” of Nigeria, an unnotarized foreign document
purportedly submitted to defendant's attorney by an individual who is not a party to the act, and therefore a witness.
This document that Judge Sunshine refers to as the “opposition submitted by the defendant” is also described in
Exhibit A as “genuine.” Exhibit C,
22 C.F.R. §92.31 says: “A notarizing officer taking an acknowledgment should always require the personal appearance
of the...person...signed the instrument to be acknowledged...failure to observe this requirement invalidates the notarial
act and makes the officer liable to the charge of negligence and of having executed a false certificate...The notarizing officer
must be certain of the identity of the parties making an acknowledgment...he should require...some evidence of identity, such
as a passport, police identity card, or the like. Exhibit
D, response from U.S. Embassy, Abuja, Nigeria: “Notarial services are executed by a Consular Office and
may include documents to be signed before them, statements made under oath...true copies...affidavits...and acknowledgments...the
only Notary Public that is recognized by the United States is a U.S. Consular Office at the Embassy.” Exhibit G, Rabbi Broyde's
Talmudic prohibition warning Jews not to report the crimes of fellow Jews to non-Jewish authorities: "...it is
prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular authorities, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law..."
Alan, I don't
expect you to do anything to change this obviously illegal situation. Talmudic doctrine and the ensuing loyalty that it spawns
in followers like you, Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Jack Gladstein, the attorneys who aided and abetted my husband identity
fraud and who found a follower in Eugene Uzamere, Bernard Rostansky and other Euro-Judaic and Euro-Judaic-oriented bigots
has screwed you so forcefully that quite a few of you are now blinded by the religious/racist jism it has ejaculated in your
fellating mouths. My only hope now is that my in forma pauperis request is accepted by a non-Jewish judge in federal court
so that I can amend my lawsuit to add you and your law-breaking friend Eugene Uzamere as defendants. I am sure the African
Americans/Hamites/Cushites/Canaanites/schvartzes will get a big kick from this letter – and from your response to it
as well. Tell Eugene that
I uploaded a copy of this letter to http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com/how_will_nysddc_respond.html, along with his glaringly unnotarized, fraudulent, foreign counter-affidavit for the whole world to see – along
with your agency's Talmud-oriented lack of response to any complaint that implicates Allen Kaye for his original role
aiding and abetting my husband's immigration and identity fraud. I'll see you and your Talmud-sucking mouths in federal
court. Respectfully,
Cheryl D. Uzamere
/cdu
|
