|
|
|
Anti-Schvartze, Talmud-Oriented Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Reign of Terror
Against Schvartze Family Greed Rationalized by Euro-Judaic,
Anti-Schvartze Racism Fuels Judge Sunshine's Continued Adjournments For No-Show Defendant Senator Uzamere Appointed by Talmud Loyalist Michael Bloomberg Protected by Talmud Loyalist Thomas A. Klonick
|
1209 Loring Avenue Apt. 6B Brooklyn, NY 11208 Tel.:
(718) 647-1708 Fax: (267)
543-3317
|
CHERYL D. UZAMERE
|
|
Click here for msg to Judge Prus
FAX
|
|
TO:
|
The Honorable Barack H. Obama, President of the
United States The Honorable
Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney Loretta
King, Assistant Attorney General * Joseph
H. Demarest, Jr., Asst. Director in Charge, FBI, NYC** Sheldon Whitehouse, U.S. Senator, Admin. Oversight Cmte.*** Charles E. Schumer, U.S. Senator, Admin. Oversight Cmte. The Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine**** The Honorable Eric I. Prus**** The Honorable Delores Thomas (c/o Judge Sunshine)****
|
FAX:
|
1-202-456-2461 1-202-514-4507 1-202-514-0293 1-212-384-4073 1-202-228-0464 1-212-486-7693 1-718-643-7655 1-718-643-7796 1-718-643-7655
|
|
SUBJECT:
|
Allegation of Bribe Acceptance by Judges
Sunshine and Prus, Allegation that Judge Thomas Was Illegally Influenced to drop my case; Allegation that Judges Sunshine
and Prus have rationalized accepting bribes from my husband based on Halachic, Anti-Schvartze Racism and Halachic doctrine
not to report the crimes of fellow Jews to gentile authorities (see attached/written by Rabbi David Chayyim).
|
|
DATE:
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
Dear Mr. President: I have taken so much abuse from these racist, law-breaking sons-of-dogs
that that thought of disguising myself and killing them with a knife in their backs is comforting to me. I don't want
to be like them and break the law. How else can I make you understand how much emotional pain the violation of my civil and
constitutional rights have caused me to suffer? For thirty years I have obeyed the law and filed complaints with the
appropriate agencies but nothing has worked. This is the last time I ask you before I take the law into my own hands. 30 fuckin' years of having my rights violated
by schvartze-hating Jews is enough. Thanks for listening.
_______________________ * Allegation re violation of my 1st, 5th and 14th Amendment rights by Judge Jeffrey
S. Sunshine, Judge Eric I. Prus and Judge Delores Thomas. **Allegation re acceptance of bribes by Judge Sunshine, Judge Prus and Judge
Thomas in violation of 18 USC §201. ***Allegation that Euro-Judaism promotes oppression of
schvartzes, prohibits Jews from reporting the crimes of other Jews to gentile authorities. I have forwarded this information
to Chuck Schumer, but I do not believe he will do shit because his religion does not allow him to report Jews to protect goy. ****See you in federal court. Sunshine
and Prus, I hope you can explain to a federal judge the legal rationale for continually adjourning a divorce action over two
years on behalf of a defendant who never interposed an answer, never showed up and never submitted any notarized affidavit.
Sunshine, I also hope you can explain to a federal judge why you accepted an authenticated fraudulent foreign document and
referred to it as “genuine.”
|
|
March 29, 2009 * The
Honorable Barack H. Obama President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. President:  This is a picture that I took the moment after I voted for you. I was so proud of you and so proud
of myself for voting that I made a point to memorialize my vote for posterity. I also believed that
because you are a renowned expert of the U.S. Constitution, one of the most, if not the most inspired legal writing next to
the Torah, your administration would be instrumental in ending the legal nightmare that started with the commission
of a crime by Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro, immigration attorneys whose religious culture advocates the enslavement/oppression
of schvartzes, and whose religion boasts having several members in positions of great governmental power who continue to violate
my constitutional rights and oppress my family.
  Do you remember Doron Braunshtein and Jackie Mason, Mr. President? Doron is the Jewish man who made the "Obama
is my slave" t-shirt. Jackie is the Jewish man who called you a "schvartze." Do you believe that Doron
and Jackie are the only European Jews who presently have more power to publicly spew their racist ideology about
you than you have to defend against it -- even as President of the United States? Do you realize how utterly powerless
you are against people who think this way?
You are not alone. Like
you, I have been subjected to Euro-Judaic, anti-schvartze racism. And like many schvartzes whose rights have been violated
by Jewish men in position of great power, when I filed complaints against men like Allen Kaye and Robert Juceam, they called me "anti-Semitic" in an obvious attempt to hide their crimes against me, marshall up others
to fight against me, and eventually, coerce my silence. Unfortunately, for many
helpless schvartzes, the Halchic doctrine regarding inferiority of black people is shared by many European Jews in positions of governmental power whose rationalization of the doctrine allows
them to violate the rights of African Americans with impunity. That is my current problem. Ever since Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro, my husband's corrupt immigration attorneys taught my husband how
to take on a fictitious identity to marry me to obtain permanent residence and abscond, leaving me pregnant with our daughter
and with no money, every municipal, state and federal agency with which I have filed a complaint has found a way to sweep
Allen Kaye's and Harvey Shapiro's aiding and abetting of my husband's marriage and identity fraud under the table.
As of this moment, I am engaged in a legal battle which has gone on for nearly two years, with adjournment after adjournment,
although my husband has never interposed an answer, never appeared in court, never submitted a signed document. How does a court case continue for so long when the defendant has never interposed an
answer -- and when statutory law and case support the Court's requirement to declare a default against
the non-appearing party? See the attached for yourself, Mr. President -- or would
the name "schvartze" uttered by funny, er, um, I mean corny racist
Jackie Mason suffice? Respectfully, 
Cheryl D. Uzamere |
|
Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses
March 29, 2009 * Joseph M. Demarest, Jr. Assistant Director in Charge FBI New York
26 Federal Plaza 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10278-0004 Dear Mr. Demarest: Can you logically present any legal rationale that allows a
New York State Supreme Court justice to, over a two-year period, continually adjourns a divorce action on behalf
of a defendant who has never interposed an answer, never appeared
in court, never provided even one signed and notarized affidavit and never
produced a retainer agreement as proof that he is represented by counsel?
Based on the legal rationale of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations, it is standard procedure for judges to declare default judgment on a party who does not appear and who does not provide the court with reasonable and meritorious reasons
for not appearing. It is also standard procedure for judges to draw an inference favorable to the adverse party in the event that a party fails to comply with NYCRR's provisions regarding the preliminary conference. Based on the above, I believe that Judge
Delores Thomas, Judge Eric Prus and Judge Jeffrey S. Sanders of Kings County Supreme Court have illegally accepted compensation
from my husband in exchange for allowing my husband to absent himself from the divorce action by continually adjourning
the case, although my husband has provided the court with no reasonable excuse or meritorious defense for his absence. This conduct violates my civil and constitutional rights based on the First, Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments regarding my right to redress grievances to the government, my right to due process and my right to equal
protection under the law. In addition, the aforesaid judges' conduct violates Title 18 of the U.S. Code regarding bribery of public officials. Ever since I reported immigration
attorneys Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro for aiding and abetting my husband's acts of immigration and identity fraud,
several members of the Jewish community in governmental positions have ignored my requests to investigate them, based on what
I believe to be the Halachic/Euro-Judaic belief of the Talmud's Abodah Zarah 26b that Jews must not report the crimes of other Jews to gentile authorities. These individuals include, but are
not limited to: Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Service; Michael Mukasey, Former U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Dept.
of Justice Michael Chertoff, Former Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland
Security Judge Nicholas Garaufis, Federal Court, Eastern District
of New York Charles Schumer, U.S. Senator, New York State Thomas A. Klonick, New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct; Alan Friedberg, Chief Counsel, New York State Departmental Disciplinary Committee, 1st Judicial Department; Michael Bloomberg,
Mayor, City of New York; Robert Morgenthau, New York County District Attorney's Office; Charles Hynes, Brooklyn District
Attorney's Office Judge Abraham Gerges, Interim
Administrative Judge, New York Supreme Court, Kings County; Sheldon
Silver, Speaker, New York State Senate
I
have forward a copy of this correspondence to President Obama in the hope that you have not been influenced to violate the
law or my rights. In addition, I have uploaded this letter to the internet so that the world will know how, in
spite of Mr. Obama's good intentions, administration responds to the needs of U.S. citizens, especially those like
me who voted for him and contributed a portion of our fixed incomes to his campaign.
Please ensure that Judges Thomas, Prus and Sanders end this reign of terror that has deprived my family of much need money
and deprived my daughter and I of our legal right to bear my husband African name.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Respectfully,
Cheryl D. Uzamere /cdu Copies to: The Honorable Barack H. Obama, President of
the United States (202-456-2461[f]) The Honorable Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney
General, U.S. Department of Justice (202-514-4507[f]) Loretta King, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice (202-514-0293[f]) Sheldon Whitehouse, Ranking Member, Administrative Oversight and the Courts (202-228-0464[f]) Charles E. Schumer, Member, Administrative Oversight and the Courts (212-486-7693]f])
18 USC §201-Bribery of Public Officials For the purpose of this section: | (2) The term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been
nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; (3) the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit,
proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in
such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit. (b)
Whoever— (2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or
indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for
any other person or entity, in return for: (4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives,
accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being
influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return
for absenting himself therefrom; shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary
equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be
disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. (c) Whoever—
(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything
of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness
upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom; shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both. |
|
|
|
Comparison of U.S. Constitution That Judges Are Required To Enforce and Halachic Law That
Judge Sunshine Uses To Rationalize His Greed
(What is Judge Sunshine's
Legal Rationale For Continually Adjourning the Divorce Action For A Defendant Who Has Refused To Appear For Almost Two Years?)
|
|
The Justice/Equality of NYS Statutes That Obey the U.S. Constitution
|
The Injustice/Inequality/Racism Euro-Judaic Halachic Law (Talmudic Legal Interpretation)
|
|
|
Halacha: The legal part of Talmudic literature. (Please note: The following are views of members of
the Euro-Judaic community only.) "...R' Bar-Chayim
discusses "Gentiles"...in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion: "...a clear distinction between
a Jew, who is defined as 'man,' and a Gentile...any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha.
R' Bar-Chayim's work...refutes the statements...that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. |
|
|
Parties' Default (NYCRR 202.27) Statutory and Case Law That Support Declaration of Default In Favor of
Plaintiff
 Default Judgment For Defendant's Lack of Appearance: If the plaintiff appears but the defendant does not, the judge
may grant judgment by default...(statutory law).
Defendant's Default Judgment Vacated Only If Excuse Is Meritorious: Ordinarily, where court grants judgment to plaintiff
based upon defendant's default in appearing at conference, default may be vacated only if defendant can demonstrate both
reasonable excuse for default in appearing and meritorious defense. Tragni v. Tragni, 21 A.D.3d 1084, 803 N.Y.S.2d
617 (2d Dep't 2005)(case law). Defendant's Failure To Appear Constitutes Unappealable Default Judgment: Defendant's failure to appear at a pretrial
conference in a personal injury action constituted an unappealable default judgment. Brannigan v. Dubuque, 199 A.D.2d
851, 606 N.Y.S.2d 401 (3d Dep't 1993)(case law). Preliminary Conference (NYCRR 202.16) Parties and Attorneys Appearances Mandatory: In matrimonial action, court held that pursuant to 22 NYCRR §
202.16(f), parties must appear with their attorneys at preliminary conference which was required under this section. Qi
v. Ng, 166 Misc. 2d 195, 632 N.Y.S.2d 757 (Sup 1995) (case law). Parties' Counsel Must Submit Retainer Agreement: A signed copy of the attorney's retainer agreement
with the client shall accompany the statement of net worth filed with the court, and the court shall examine the agreement
to assure that it conforms to Appellate Division attorney conduct and disciplinary rules. Where substitution of counsel occurs
after the filing with the court of the net worth statement, a signed copy of the attorney's retainer agreement shall be
filed with the court within 10 days of its execution.(statutory) Judge May Rule in Adverse Party's Favor for Failure To Comply: The failure to comply with the provisions of this subdivision
shall be good cause, in the discretion of the judge presiding...to draw an inference favorable to the adverse party with respect
to any disputed fact or issue affected by such failure.(statutory)
|
|
|
|
The Anti-Gentile Teachings of the Talmud (As explained by European Jews themselves)
|
|
Corrupt Judge Sunshine Admits That "Defendant Has Failed To Interpose An Answer" Since This Is The Case, Why The Hell Does Judge Sunshine Continue To Adjourn The Case
For A Defendant Who Has Never Answered Or Appeared In Court?
Could Greed, Rationalized by Anti-Schvartze Racism Be The Motivating Factor?
|
|
|
|
|
